by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on January 12 2021 16:13 zulu


TD;DR: the effort would be trivial to intimidate SCOTUS into reinterpreting "CONGRESS shall make no law..." as the 1st Amendment restricting ONLY CONGRESS. After all, the courts have easily and continuously reinterpreted, discovered magical exceptions to; and damn-near inverted, the prohibition of the word, INFRINGED, in the context of the 2nd Amendment "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". End.



I despise the State, that is to write 'Government', with an unyielding malevolence; and will never submit to this worship of government as paternal guardian.

But these actions do not violate the First Amendment-

Not when every effort to intimidate SCOTUS has been so successful.  SCOTUS will reinterpret "CONGRESS shall make no law..." as the 1st Amendment restricting ONLY CONGRESS. No one will fight. The People are so easy frightened by and deferential to empty threats.

Since the January 6th 2021 protests, less than one day into which 'intrepid patriots' abandoned all courage to run away, the most influential social media platforms - collectively 'BIG TECH' - have banned President Trump: Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, Spotify, Twitch, Shopify and Stripe.More...


categories: government | opinion | rights

Some Pre-Made Stock Responses

by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on November 21 2020 09:08 zulu

When dealing with triggered snowflakes & the enraged outraged on social media platforms, I decided taking more than a few seconds in response would be a waste of my time; so, I created a series of "stock responses" to post instead.

I tried to write responses original to me, based on the images I found.


A few of them are:







categories: opinion | personal | rights

The LEFT'S version of free speech

by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on November 20 2020 09:00 zulu

Google and Twitter censoring speech and locking the accounts of all dissenting from the LEFTIST doctrine - Bill Gates citing free speech as a problem to be restrained - well, I made a graphic expressing the LEFT'S version of FREE SPEECH.

Bill Gates' quote:

Larger Version More...


categories: government | opinion | personal | rights

Twitter Judged My 10-minute Work TOO REALISTIC

by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on November 13 2020 14:44 zulu

One of my works of 1st Amendment political satire had to do with the current (Nov 12th 2020) controversy over Target Stores BANNING books reported for violating CORRECT SPEECH!

So... I quickly found an image, and over 10-minutes made this criticism of Target, complete with the Target logo...

Twitter banned me in a matter of SECONDS (later reversed) claiming my work was considered too realistic.



The small version...


... And the Large Version More...


categories: leftist tech | opinion | rights

it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it

by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on November 08 2020 23:34 zulu

I am told, "You CANNOT oppose the U.S. Government".


So, at what point did that stop being a RIGHT?


After all, the text of the U.S. Declaration of Independence seems to omit, "JUST THIS ONE TIME" when declaring, "... it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..." as if such a Right extended into perpetuity.


Seditious, treasonous, subversive... perhaps to them unaware that these condemnations are duplicity; when in truth, throughout documented history authoritarian rule has always first proscribed that which threatens state or monarchical rule over the populace. Freedom and Liberty conceal no such fear.


Then again, the same document; that emphasized as incontrovertible each citizen's Right "...to alter or to abolish...", is also unequivocal about "UNALIENABLE RIGHTS" and consider how well that decree has been honored...More...


categories: collectivism | leftist tech | government | rights

The U.S. Civil War, Part II the Conclusion

by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on November 06 2020 02:41 zulu

Curious - to what extent do mass voter fraud, destruction of cities, and a stolen presidency justify civil war?

If the veritable will of the People, the vote of each citizen, perishes beneath the oppressive burden of election collusion and fraud - is this, then, not 'Taxation Without Representation'? Is this, then, not as the Founders prescribed '...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends...'?

I am not attempting to agitate others' cowardice - calling upon civil war to drag the passive yet outraged masses from their La-Z-Boys to forfeit cable television and fantasy football for resistive action; no, not at all. The masses are and have always been verbally defiant when secured against privacy's bosom, yet reveal themselves to be sheep, obsequious and docile, in the presence of authority; a recreant herd all too ready to sacrifice their neighbors and family for promised security and coddling. 

Indisputably true considering documented history narrates - narrates to them with reading comprehension - that only a risible minority of colonists wanted to stand defiant against England, while the vaster majority preferred deferential subservience to the Monarchy.

Yes, the founding of the United States of America resulted from the action of a very few to liberate the undeserving many.

Election events subsequent the aggressions of the collective Leftists offer fascinating insight into the latent yet fomenting sentiment leading up to the first U.S., Civil War, and writing with sincerity, I believe no other resolution remains now and hereafter than bifurcation of a country. The cognitive, political and philosophical disparities have become oil and water. Neither compromise nor common ground remains. The Constitution has become too mutable and fragile to unite Individualists and Collectivists, Socialism and Capitalism, the Authoritarian and the Free.

I have analyzed the strategies and probabilities of such a conflict; although I could explain, for the reader I will simply write that in none does any government prevail against even a mere 2% of a population equal to that of the U.S.; yes, notwithstanding the advanced ordinance of a military, success is not possible against the smallest percentage of 331 million citizens, and any retaliation by a government would serve only to increase that percentage by logarithmic scale. The riots of these months passed expose the debility of an authoritarian regime against citizens passionate and motivated.

In my analyses, the United States now and hereafter is an inexorable subdivision into two autonomous nations; perhaps a socialist government united by centralized authority, which I would title the Federal States of America; and the other a free-market and libertarian unity among states titled the Sovereign States of America.


(Назревает настоящая гражданская война)

- L.Nicholas de Lioncourt, 4th November 2020


For them wanting an easier-to-read version, just open a print preview.





categories: collectivism | government | personal | rights

1st Amendment Protected Opinion of this Simpleton

by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on October 22 2020 01:38 zulu



categories: collectivism | government | opinion | rights


by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on October 22 2020 01:18 zulu


categories: collectivism | government | opinion | rights

Infographic I made in 2015 about the 2nd Amendment

by   Nicholas de Lioncourt on October 14 2020 02:58 zulu

Found an infographic I made in 2015 about the 2nd Amendment

infographic blandishment by l. nicholas de lioncourt


Larger Version More...


categories: opinion | personal | rights